Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Does Team India have the ammunition to win the T20 World Cup?


No team has won the T20 World Cup more than once and can the men in blue become the first team to achieve this feat and answer the fervent prayers of billion Indians?

Obviously, it doesn’t need a rocket scientist to figure out that the Indian team appears imperious in sub-continental conditions, and the staging of the marquee event in Sri Lanka only lulls me into thinking that Mahendra Singh Dhoni’s men have to be one of the favorities on this front alone.


As I delve deeper, I wonder whether only familiar playing conditions (sub-continental conditions) and formidable batting line-up are enough to secure the passport to ‘glory’.


On umpteen occasions, we have heard this; and surely we have not heard the last of it! India possessing one of the world’s best batting line-ups almost sounds like a tedious one-liner given its overuse in public domain over the years.

We have an opener Virender Sehwag, who loves to take the bulls by its horns and pummel the opposition into submission. The hassle with him is that he is becoming a bit of a ‘cameo master’ in recent times and often exudes a false confidence about shouldering more responsibility and using his head to bat deep in the innings.

The damaging impact Viru has on its opponents when he fires on all cylinders is known to us but I want to ask one question? How many times have Sehwag got the 70s, 80s, 90s in the shorter version? Even for a format like T20 it is imperative for a top-order batsman to score the 70s, 80s and 90s, if not a hundred to help the team post an imposing total, if batting first, or while chasing down a tall target.

Viru has been guilty of chucking it away when he has the bowlers at its mercy – something which is becoming a regular sight these days. Gautam Gambhir has also fallen prey to the ‘inconsistent syndrome’ though it has to be said that the southpaw at least tries to drop anchor if not on an consistent basis.


There is enormous pressure on Virat Kohli – who is in the form of his life – to bail out his side day in day out because our openers haven’t quite been able to stamp their authority given their combined rich experience on the big stage.


You got to understand that one Virat Kohli cannot alone lift our batting department in its pursuit of glory. There has to be guys who should be ready to play the support cast roles around Virat, allowing him the leeway to play his natural game.


The immensely talented Rohit Sharma thankfully announced his return to 'form' in the practice game against Pakistan after enduring a dreadful run off late. But knowing Rohit’s propensity to ‘flirt’ with 'inconsistency', one is not sure whether his effort against Pakistan was just a flash in the pan.


Suresh Raina has been doing exceedingly well in the ODIs in the last few months and with the comeback man Yuvraj Singh in the fold, one hopes our middle-order wears a settled look. Yuvraj, in particular, would be itching to have another impressive run on the World Cup stage after a prolonged battle with cancer. His heroics at the 2011 World Cup (50 overs format) is well documented and this time around Yuvi would be extra motivated to cap off a successful comeback.


Skipper Mahendra Singh Dhoni would be better off not to leave things to the final over. The Chennai T20 defeat against New Zealand must have enhanced the number of Dhoni-bashers, but to be honest, one would expect Mahi to learn from that defeat and put in place better gameplans to counter such situations in future. Surely, we had enough of last-ball wins and Mr. Dhoni, we don’t need any more of that please!


The biggest selection headache for the team would be to play seven batsmen or five bowlers. Let’s face it; Dhoni seems comfortable with the idea of playing seven batsmen as it beefs up the batting department.

Playing seven batsmen implies that some of them have to double up as part-timers – the likes of Yuvraj, Rohit, Raina and Kohli – but such a strategy can backfire if the part-timers are taken to the cleaners and those ‘runs’ decide the fate of a match. Personally, I have also felt that if the number six batsman is not going to deliver, I don’t expect the seventh batsman to do any wonders.


What has become striking lately is that our part-timers haven’t been able to keep the opposition on a tight leash, which have given the India bowling a weak look. Here, I am no way to trying to pin the blame on the part-timers - after all, its a gamble that sometimes pays off and sometimes it doesn't.

This not to shield our frontline bowlers – Zaheer Khan has loads of experience and he needs to put that into play. In the T20 format Zaheer hasn't inspired much confidence in recent times. Even the likes of Lakshmipathy Balaji, Ashok Dinda and Irfan Pathan would also have to come up with the goods because its only teams having penetrating bowling attacks, who would be the favourities to win the T20 World Cup. 
In the spin department Ravichandran Ashwin is in fine fettle while another comeback Harbhajan Singh would be keen to make a big impression and cement his spot in the national side via the T20 route and subsequently earn recalls to the Test and ODI teams.

India’s famed batting department may run up towering totals but what’s the point if our bowlers keep leaking runs. It’s as simple as that.


Playing five bowlers would be a brave move on Dhoni’s part but at some point of time the Indian team management would have to explore such an option if the part-timers are clobbered. Talking of playing five bowlers automatically means Irfan Pathan has a big role to perform not just with the ball but also with the bat.


To be fair to Pathan, he is a decent bat who can play the big shots and has a pretty sound technique to weather the best of bowling attacks. Playing Pathan as an all-rounder would allow Dhoni to play three seamers and two spinners or even two seamers and three spinners, but knowing the Sri Lankan conditions he might be tempted to play two seamers and three spinners.


To top it all, India is an ageing side with as many as seven players in the 30-33 age bracket. India are also one of the slowest movers in the field as compared to most other top teams. A weak bowling attack and slackness in the field are two aspects India would look to cover up with their strengths, which is going to be a tough ask as the men in blue seek to pop the champagne on October 7!


Follow Suhrid Barua on Twitter (https://twitter.com/suhridbarua)  

11 comments:

Sumanta Chakraborty said...

Nice article..comments about viru,gauti,virat,msd is brilliant- agree- but u shld mention a lill bout yuvi..with all due respect to him n his heroic return I still blv he is not ready for crunch games ! U shld mention a lill bit bout that..n I dn buy that 'Gavaskar' theory of if 6batsman can't do, 7th cant- what if 20 reqd from 9 balls n a proper batsman walks in instead of Aswin? We dn hv that quality 5th specialist bowler who will win a T20 with his 4 overs !Thus, No point playing a 5th bowler in place of a batsman ! Eventually with yuvi,raina,viru in the team u can manage 4 overs in a T20 specially in sub-continental condition !

Unknown said...

Very difficult for #India to win,T20 World Cup my personal view..But shall definitely be very happy if they win! After all My very own country! But somehow I feel the rhythm is missing !

Anish said...

Nicely articulated. Bowling continues to be our Achilles heel in all forms of the game. Our frontline bowlers are also mostly part timers. Combine that with a bunch of unathletic fielders , unless our batsmen click and put up an insurmountable total or chase down mammoth scores there is no hope for our team.

Unknown said...

A good review on Indian team situation !! Every point on Viru Dhoni is superb... Still the situation continuing is if Viru fails batting also struggles !!

Suri_Sing said...

Perfect Analysis. I guess time to go for 5 bowlers. I think Bhajji can come in for Rohit in the game against Eng. Batting seems to be fine & MSD handles slow bowling better than pace. So your analysis of 2 seamers and 3 spinners should be way for team india

Suhrid Barua said...

sumanta, vetri, suri, devjani, anish.....really appreciate your thoughtful/insightful comments....look forward to them always on this space..........

Unknown said...

you some it up perfectly. India need Gambir and Sehwag to fire if they want to win matches. The batting has pressure because of the poor bowling.

The playing conditions (sub continent) is not as big a factor in this shortest form of the game, which means that it is hard for 1 team to dominate.

I cant seen past South Africa, England, West Indies or Sri lanka if im being honest. Pakistan probably up there aswel.

Unknown said...

Everyone check out my cricket blog: http://simplycricketblog.blogspot.co.uk/

Sajish said...

Very nice article Mr. Suhrid Barua. My comments - You cannot depend on Viru and Gauti each every time. Playing both in the match is losing one bowler short. The idea of opening Irfan with Viru is a good option and do not forget Manoj Tiwary. Viru/Irfan (No Gambhir will allow 2 spinners to play), Tiwary/Gambhir (Irfan as bowler - One spinner short). Piyush Chawla is a best option against Australia and South Africa in Super 8 so Ashwin to be sit out for him) We should change the XI according to the strength of opposition. Harbhajan to be sit out against Pak. My team for first match Vs Australia in Super 8- Viru,Irfan,Kohli,Rohit,Raina,Dhoni,Ashwin,Harbhajan,Dinda,Zaheer, Piyush Chawla.

Unknown said...

Very well written Suhrid! A thoughtful analysis. The Indian think tank needs to fire at the right spots. I will remain optimistic though.

Suhrid Barua said...

Aditya: we got to be upbeat about our chances- its all about plugging d loopholes and playing to our strengths

How poor managers can cause serious reputational damage to a brand!

In a fiercely competitive marketplace, companies always have one goal in mind – how it can be ‘best heard’. Companies are increasingly ‘tak...